Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pangea3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Even with the COI issue, it does meet notability. (non-admin closure) treelo  radda  00:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Pangea3

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A legal outsourcing firm written up by user:Pangea3. Are they notable? &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Is a recognized outsourcing firm. Although the creator probably presents WP:COI in creating the article (he has been blocked for his username), the article itself is well sourced and does not present any strong bias and advertising traits in writing. LeaveSleaves talk 03:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. "it was recognized as one of the leading legal outsourcing services companies in India" If someone can verify that from the paid source, it's clearly worth keeping. - Mgm|(talk) 10:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Despite the COI issues with the creator, this meets notability. — Rlevse • Talk  • 20:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.