Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panjeta (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article has since been improved and sources, Also towns etc etc are kept per GEOLAND, Anyway consensus is to keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Panjeta
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mass of red links. Fails WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:50, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:50, 25 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep The article already mentioned the village in Ludhiana district. I have just expanded on that. The caste stuff remains as unverifiable as it was at the original 2013 AfD and should be removed, but that is not a reason to delete the remainder of the content. - Sitush (talk) 05:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I removed the caste stuff. - NitinMlk (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NPLACE. Small-village stubs are perfectly acceptable provided they can be shown to exist (which this one does). Primefac (talk) 20:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.