Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panna Maria Grays


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Texas Civil War Confederate units. I relisted it at first, but I found out that the consensus is to redirect the article, so I'm closing this properly. (non-admin closure)  Mario Jump  83!  10:01, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Panna Maria Grays

 * – ( View AfD View log )

per my searches and discussion on talk, seems to fail GNG and WP:MILUNIT. Not seeing anything worth keeping or meeting notability here. Clear coi creation (user:SilesiaUSA, article claims to mostly consist of silesians) Eddie891 Talk Work 23:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Texas Civil War Confederate units although I wouldn't be sad to see it deleted. I was part of the talk page discussion, and the only source giving significant attention to this I could find is an obscure college thesis that doesn't meet WP:SCHOLARSHIP.  Claim of mostly Silesians is dubious and contradictory to statements I found in some RS suggesting only 4 known Poles. Too small to meet MILUNIT.  With no inline citations and disputable content, merging anything is not appropriate. Hog Farm Bacon 23:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect: as above, as much as this is interesting, doesn't seem to be much on this unit, and no RS for the article. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect: Agree with above, this is interesting, Polish Texans in Civil War Confederate Units. Nonetheless, no RS so merge. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:23, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.