Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantelimon at Şoseaua Iancului


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Pantelimon at Şoseaua Iancului

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There are 8,000 such buildings in Bucharest, with many more across Romania and indeed the whole of the former Eastern Bloc. That they happen to have 16 or 19 floors rather than 10 or 12 does not make them notable. For that, multiple, independent sources would be necessary, but these are wholly lacking. They are not among the tallest buildings in Bucharest; nor are they even the city's highest apartment bloc (that would be the Griviţa Bloc) or its largest (Apartment Building 63). No reason to keep, then. Biruitorul Talk 18:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages:


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 23:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete the given references don't even seem work! What about the remaining entries in Tall buildings in Bucharest? Most of those aren't really notable and merging them into an expanded version of List of tallest buildings in Bucharest might be much better. Nergaal (talk) 01:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That's definitely something we should look into. I don't, for instance, see the Griro Tower as having much notability, beautiful though it may be. - Biruitorul Talk 01:43, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete all - these are clearly not an independent topics, serve no encyclopedic purpose, and are clearly not backed by adequate referencing. They are clearly not notable even in a Romanian, nay, a Bucharest context. Merger into List of tallest buildings in Bucharest is worth considering, but let's remember that even that list has to end somewhere (I'm suddenly reminded of the joke about the Soviet dwarf being the tallest dwarf in the world). Dahn (talk) 03:54, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.