Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panthera Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Panthera Corporation

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

organization of questionable notability, part of a series of articles created by this same editor and his obvious sockpuppet Wuh  Wuz  Dat  15:48, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete per nom --SquidSK (1MC•log) 16:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep the company as been mentioned in a number of 3rd party references. I would like to see more where the company is the subject of the article, not a specific project or collaboration. RadioFan (talk) 17:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Panthera is in fact the subject of most of the sources cited in the article. When an article is referenced in this way then is unhelpful for deletion nominators and their supporters to claim unnotability without explaining what is wrong with the sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep but clean up. It may have started out as spam, but this is a notable charity.  I've heard of it in any case.  There are reliable soruces cited in the stub already, and more can be found easily online, see . Bearian (talk) 16:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources seem solid enough to establish notability, tone is reasonably encyclopedic. --MelanieN (talk) 07:17, 15 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.