Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Iacullo (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 15:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Paolo Iacullo
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lack of notability. Those sources that are abou him are flimsy at best; the remaining two mention him but are merely using him as an example. TheLongTone (talk) 14:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Journalism, Fashion,  and Italy.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete This person again? Same sources as last time, local Toronto businessman. There is an upcoming election for mayor here, I wonder if this is some sort of pre-promo (I have no proof that he's running, but just an fyi in case we see more Toronto people pop up on wiki all of a sudden). Oaktree b (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. As always, businesspeople are not "inherently" notable, or "inherently" entitled to have Wikipedia articles, just because they exist — the notability test isn't in what the article says, but in how well the article can reference the things it says to WP:GNG-worthy coverage about him in reliable sources independent of his own self-promotion. But three of the four sources here aren't reliable or GNG-worthy publications at all, and the only one that is a reliable, GNG-worthy publication just glancingly namechecks his existence as a provider of soundbite in an article about something other than himself, which still isn't the kind of sourcing it takes. Bearcat (talk) 17:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - simply not enough in-depth coverage to show that they meet WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 13:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.