Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Sitanggang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Paolo Sitanggang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  19:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  19:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  19:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete: Per WP:BLPSOURCES, unreferenced BLP fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * That is not a criterion for speedy deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * "contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion." also per WP:A7.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:A7 does not apply. The bar for importance is far lower than that for notability. The rest of this argument is not covered by WP:CSD. WP:BLPSOURCES refers to the inclusion of material in an article, not the creation or deletion thereof. Also, none of the material in this article is particularly contentious. Despite the poor sourcing, no one is calling the veracity of the article into question. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * According to WP:BLPPROD articles created without any sources after march 18 2010 should be proposed for deletion, and that PROD can not be removed unless reliable sources are added. Also I do not think any of the claims in the article are notable, just been a player of a team that does not play in a fully professional league is not notable, but since you ask, and just in case, I have removed the Speedy. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:39, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The one external link supports the single sentence (even though it is a wiki), therefore WP:BLPPROD is not applicable. — Jkudlick t c s 01:30, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTBALL. -- Sam Sing! 19:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. MbahGondrong (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – Has not yet played in a WP:FPL or FIFA tier 1 match. Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. — Jkudlick t c s 01:30, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as he hasn't played in a Fully Professional League and doesn't have any international caps. IJA (talk) 15:14, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.