Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo zampolli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 20 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Paolo zampolli

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

High number of GHits, but mostly associated with Page Six type short blurbs. Probably best know for using high-end fashion models to sell exclusive properties in Manhattan and return of a lost expensive Rolex. No GNEWS of substance. CSD removed by SPA. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb1 (talk) 21:15, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - This summary is full of baseless accusations. First of all, Paolo Zampolli is a legitamate businessman who was a pioneer in the fashion modeling business. The comments above related to "using high-end models to sell exclusive properties" was about 0.0001% of Zampolli's business in the fashion industry. The accusation of "CSD removed by SPA" is also baseless as I (Notorious_guy) am not a SPA. I am an Wikipedia user doing as Wikipedia instructs users to do when they see a baseless claim for deletion. Wikipedia ASKS USERS TO DELETE THE TAG!!!! Sometimes the system of tag deletion works and the system of editors policing does not. This is one of those cases.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notorious guy (talk • contribs) 22:31, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment – The difficulty of creating an article that is violates WP:COI is it sometimes clouds one's view of the facts. Nothing in the summary is incorrect nor is anything there an accusation.  That said, I would focus on showing how this article meets the criteria in WP:BIO, WP:REF, and WP:VERIFY.  Without this the article may fail the AfD.  My best to you.   ttonyb1  (talk) 00:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 07:45, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 07:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 07:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.