Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PaperCut MF


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

PaperCut MF

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic looks to be a WP:NCORP/WP:NSOFTWARE failure. The article cites a number of sources—many of which are WP:PRIMARY—but none are particularly in-depth as mandated by WP:CORPDEPTH; many are basic profile articles hosted by listing websites. A WP:BEFORE search turns up more of the same type of source and a large amount of press releases, which are also considered to be inadequate by NCORP. Information on the product (same name as the company) is lacking. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)


 * delete Not all software is notable. This is very minor, not innovative, not widely used and (despite being some years ago) has had no lasting influences. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete the article as is, does not indicate that the subject has satisfied WP:GNG.  starship .paint  (talk) 05:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.