Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper Aeroplanes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep withdrawn after improvements to article. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 07:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Paper Aeroplanes

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Request from User:69.181.249.92 to create this AFD. Reason given: Fails WP:BAND "The usual DB-BAND reasons apply - no indication of notability, no reliable secondary sources, etc" Stephen! Coming... 16:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - this was done because a speedy was declined based on the long term existence of the article. Fair enough. All the reasons laid out in WP:CSD A7 would seem to apply, primarily that the article doesn't indicate notability. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 16:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Judging the article by its contents when nominated, it looks like a strong deletion candidate, but there is enough coverage around both to establish notability and have a decent article. The BBC has several items on the band: BBC Wales Music article, album review, interview, details of their live session on BBC Radio 2 (bottom of page), live video sessions. In addition there is coverage from The Guardian (interview), South Wales Echo, South Wales Argus , and the Milford & West Wales Mercury (. The article clearly doesn't do them justice. --Michig (talk) 20:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - If somebody would integrate those refs and provide accompanying text I would gladly withdraw the nomination. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 06:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Done.--Michig (talk) 07:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * And done. (Somebody may will have to clean up this close, given my inexperience with such edits. And a note on the article talk page about this AFD is also a nice touch.) 69.181.249.92 (talk) 07:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.