Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papers from the Institute of Archaeology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to UCL Institute of Archaeology.  Sandstein  10:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Papers from the Institute of Archaeology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable journal. This is the in-house journal of the UCL Institute of Archaeology, making it a local publication; there are no sources with in-depth coverage in the article and nothing obvious in google web or google scholar. Merge and redirect to UCL Institute of Archaeology also a possibility. PROD declined based on abstracting, which doesn't appear to be policy based. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 17.  — cyberbot I  Notify Offline 03:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge I don't think that the databases that include it are selective enough to make this qualify under WP:NJournals. It would appear to be most logical to include a few lines on the journal in the article on the institute that publishes it. --Randykitty (talk) 14:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.