Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paperwavium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Paperwavium
Neologism, no Google hits. —Kirill Lok s hin 01:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and a dicdef even if it's established. Draeco 01:33, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. *drew 01:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax like "Administratium" Ruby 01:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reasons as the AfD for paperwaving. This was created shortly after the AfD went up for Paperwaving by the same person that started that article. Peyna 03:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-verifiable, non-notable, mild vandalism, likely hoax, and dicdef anyway. --Lockley 16:44, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. Actual quote:  "Paperwavium is the substantiation by funding of obviously and indirectly or directly verifiable phenomena, which could otherwise be ascertained by a quick read of the established literature."  Read that slowly and tell me that it doesn't say "paperwavium is the funding of things that exist but could be looked up in a manual if they weren't funded."  WTF? Ergot 17:14, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I read it as "using grant money to verify things that everyone already knows about"--in other words, wasting funding to tell you things that should be obvious. NO? rodii


 * Delete as hoax. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-27 21:28Z 
 * Delete per nom. Nick Catalano (Talk) 00:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, reluctantly, per nom. rodii 00:56, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.