Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pappzd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Pappzd

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This website doesn't seem to meet our notability guidelines for web content. The sources in the article are either written by Pappzd, or only contain passing mentions of the magazine itself, and I couldn't find any good sources online. I note that the site was nominated for a couple of awards, but I'm not sure that these awards are "well-known and independent" per the guideline. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 12:32, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:WEB. Notoriety based on the web site's release of a sex tape resulting in cease and desist orders does not establish significant independent coverage or recognition. Per WP:NRVE, that is only short-term interest. Being mentioned in articles about other topics does not establish Wikipedia notability. The tone of the article fails WP:PROMOTION. Author of this article is WP:SPA; only contributions are to this article. Likely WP:COI. DocTree (talk) 18:30, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 22:51, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per failure of GNG. The references are not enough to establish notability (as mentioned, they are either first party, or only passing mentions in relation only to the sex tape scandal), and I can find nothing to indicate that the awards they won are notable themselves.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.