Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paracommunications (paracomms)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Paracommunications (paracomms)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is probably an essay  or original  research but  it  may  be suitable for another Wikimedia project  such  as Wiktionary ( but  that  is not  for us to  decide here). DePRODed by creator without  asddressing  the issue. Concern was: Dictionary definition. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as an unnotable, unnoticed WP:NEOLOGISM. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable neologism per nomination and Clarityfiend, no mention of it online apart from a non-notable marketing outfit. Nothing worth moving to Wiktionary. Dai Pritchard (talk) 08:10, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.