Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradise Day Spa and Bath House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 07:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Paradise Day Spa and Bath House
Delete as advertisement. Fails WP:CORP (despite being "heralded as the first of its kind in Queensland." --mtz206 (talk) 01:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. --M e rovingian { T C @ } 01:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete adcruft. Aplomado  talk 01:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Jammo (SM247) 01:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet WP:CORP. A search of an Australia New Zealand database failed to come up with any returns for this business. Sounds like a nice place to go but not encyclopedic at this stage. Capitalistroadster 02:24, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 02:24, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 02:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Coredesat 07:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article practically screams "ad".  --Roisterer 14:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as commercial advertising. Also as per nominator: WP:CORP. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 15:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Again, an obvious advert here. -- Pilot| guy 15:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. J I P  | Talk 17:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. J I P  | Talk 17:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.