Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradiso Girls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Blueboy96 17:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Paradiso Girls

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Claims a couple notable members but really no reliable sources. Only sources cited are YouTube and MySpace and fansites. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Babiiblooma4eva*Keep.I think that this shouldn't be deleted because i don't see how it interferes with the rules. Really. Maybe the person that nominated this to be deleted just doesn't like the Paradiso Girls or something. They have an album and a song. Keep it until we see what else is added on — Preceding comment was added at 01:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete until such a time as the contents of the article can be WP:verified through the use of WP:reliable sources. -- saberwyn 01:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Of course the group is an upcoming one but several of its members are known and the group has been dealt with a lot in fans community. All statements are sourced. They even have a song out now. I'd say keep for now and see where this goes. At least wait until the album comes out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siemgi (talk • contribs) 00:10, May 6, 2008
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Everything is sourced apart from the songlist. I think the songlist should be deleted for now, but keep the info on the band, definitely. 128.232.250.213 (talk) 13:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp (talk) 23:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. They haven't even released their first album yet.  May or may not be notable in the future, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.  KleenupKrew (talk) 00:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Fails WP:MUSIC. Fails WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N. I am also influenced by the complete lack of ghits on google news! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence, by references to reliable sources, has been produced that the band satisfies WP:MUSIC. The references in the article are to fansites, which do not pass WP:RS. Keep proponents are making general WP:ILIKEIT arguments. Nsk92 (talk) 01:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC. Could become notable in the future, but they aren't now. Good Ol’factory (talk) 07:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.