Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradox sector


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 08:09, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Paradox sector
This little message board can hardly be called notable. 70.119.8.76 02:28, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The small member base, while keeping it slow, also removes some of the possibility for having a Wikipedia article. And Original Research. D. G. 03:05, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete good one, DG. ;) I don't agree that this is OR, though. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 03:11, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Trivial, advertisement-ish vanity page. If we get any indication that it's somehow noteworthy despite its small size, it probably only merits a very brief mentioning on Totse anyway, not its own article. But that seems unlikely. Also, doesn't cite enough sources. :F -Silence 23:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

The website is not trivial... as many people find it each day as a better alternative to some bad messageboards out there. -Dvigour 05:19, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Hardly its worth is quite obvious it is a younger site in the growing stages. It has alread proved itself noteworthy in it's ability to help the user with technical issues as well as personal.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.