Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paragon Algorithm (Short Film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:43, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Paragon Algorithm (Short Film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film lacking non-trivial support. red dogsix (talk) 00:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. There seem to be a few Wikipedia articles about this filmmaker and his films.  They probably all need to be examined for notability.  The original article was pretty messy, so I tried to clean it up a bit, such as adding URLs to the citations.  One of the citations goes to a blog on Blogspot, another goes to a questionable online magazine, and another goes to an article on Forbes.com written by a blogger.  The Forbes.com article doesn't mention this film and is used as decoration, I suppose.  I didn't remove that or the IMDb user rating, as I didn't want my edit to get reverted.  I don't really see anything better than this on Google.  As someone's debut short film, it's quite difficult to get coverage.  The other articles probably have a better chance. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * While one does find coverage such as this, I agree it falls short of GNG and NFILM. Delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.