Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parangcho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Please consider continuing merge/redirect discussion on article talk page.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:32, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Parangcho

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )


 * Delete. Non-notable geographical feature. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:47, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - Added this source to the article:
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 00:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 00:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep The article cited not only shows the notability but explains why it is not just technically notable, but is  actually of importance.  DGG ( talk ) 04:22, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG: while the article itself certainly does not explain notability, the cited article does (the reef could become important in a territorial dispute with China) lws (talk) 06:25, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable geographic reef. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect Non-notable geographical feature. This is essentially an arbitrary feature named as part of a territorial dispute, until it's used outside the context of that dispute it should be merged and redirected there (I'll admit to not knowing exactly where). Stuartyeates (talk) 08:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.