Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paras Hospitals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Delete: additional sources do not provide significant discussion of the subject. Drmies (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Paras Hospitals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable Shyamsunder (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, User Shyamsunder is intentionally keeping this page for deletion. Administrators are requested to warn/block this user. GKCH (talk) 05:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: @Gokulchandola: Not a valid argument to keep the article. If articles do not meet certain criteria, they are deleted. There nothing done intentionally and Shyamsunder is aware of what he is doing. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 15:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Agree with User:LeoFrank that this is discussion section for article may keep/delete. If you read some links given by User:MelanieN feel relevance of page. Paras Hospital is one of the best hospital in NCR. Yes I agree information need to be added.GKCH (talk) 16:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: @Gokulchandola: You are not getting the point. Please read WP:ATA. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 16:24, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep The article itself contains only primary sources, but a search finds some coverage and many mentions in Reliable Sources. Given that I was only searching in English, it is reasonable to assume there would be more coverage in other languages. --MelanieN (talk) 00:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: From the sources you have mentioned, this is a very small article. The other three:, , are mostly about treatments that some people have received at this hospital and are not really covering the hospital as such. It fails WP:GNG. &mdash;  LeoFrank   Talk 15:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per my comments above. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 15:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: Per the message left on my TP An editor feels I closed this early than needed be so thus reopened/relisted.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:12, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete There are only passing mentions, as LeoFrank says. No indication of notability - thankfully, the idea of inherent notability has not yet passed from schools to hospitals. - Sitush (talk) 17:57, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, only trivial or passing mentions in sources, although there could be substantial material in Indian languages that I can't read. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC).
 * Weak or strong but Delete - not notable enough to be here. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 10:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.