Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parc Omega


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. 10 days and no one agrees with me, I think that's a consensus. Wizardman 15:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Parc Omega

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to be notable, though it may be if sources are added in. Wizardman 19:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as a possibly notable, but very real place. Independent sources can be added later. Bearian 23:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 20:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Google gives over 23,000 hits; I'm sure there's something useful in there that could be used for a source. It might have to be trimmed a bit, though. GlassCobra 21:36, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins 00:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.