Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parc Palais


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Parc Palais

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:N. Insignificant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Comatmebro (talk) 06:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment I would say there would be many source in Chinese language. However, the common problem is, how significant those coverage in order to allow wiki editor to write a full length article. For "Parc Palais", most of the coverage seem about individual residential unit inside the building complex, so it seem fails GNG for the whole residential blocks as a whole. However, since there is a lot of these residential villages articles from Hong Kong, and their exposure on the media is quite different in length, may be it need a general guide formed by a consensus. I would say if their architectural feature was reported in some book or a lengthy article (e.g. Opus Hong Kong, Lai Tak Tsuen), then it pass GNG. Matthew hk (talk) 08:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * May be Delete for this article "Parc Palais". Matthew hk on public computer (talk) 11:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:09, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment, this appears to be the estate mentioned at King's Park, Hong Kong ("The site on which the hospital buildings once were was sold by 1999,[5] and is now a private housing estate,[6]") so maybe a redirect would be appropriate? Coolabahapple (talk) 10:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I disagree such redirect. King's Park is an non-administrative area (a neighbourhood, but local never use this term). It is nightmare to read and maintain every "neighbourhood" article of Hong Kong, since the boundary is undefined, those articles contain content that probably not belongs to that neighbourhood, or wrote duplicate copy of articles (well there is way too many Yuen Long articles for example. It also quite a many Tai Po but partially fixed). Parc Palais, according to report, sometimes credited as part of King's Park, sometimes Ho Man Tin. I have to check the map, but Parc Palais may be belongs to Kowloon City District or Yau Tsim Mong District, the electoral district (they de jure administrative districts but de facto just for local councils that almost near to rubber stamp to advise the government, it never equal to the school districts, the police districts or the fire brigade districts or other internal districts of government department, as well as not equal to urban planning plans the OZPs). However, it seem odd to mention one and only one residential village in the District article, then it may need to expand to a full section to at least mention some "notable" (i.e. at least have some citation) one . Matthew hk (talk) 17:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 15:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete There are notable residential complexes, But I see no evidence that this particular residential complex is notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:06, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.