Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pardot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 06:16, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Pardot

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable and no reasonable assertion of notability. Refs are mostly own web-site or Publicity releases. Nothing of any reputation. Small back-office support software house with a small (600) client base  Velella  Velella Talk 19:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep The article meets WP:GNG because of, , , and . Sp33dyphil © • © 07:02, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - Topic is just meeting WP:GNG
 * • Carr, David F. (May 23, 2011). "Zeroing In On Leads With Pardot Marketing Automation." Forbes Magazine.
 * • Carr, David F. (August 31, 2011). "Pardot Ties Social Media To Marketing Automation Tools." Information Week.
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:09, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets GNG just fine.  Next time follow WP:BEFORE and do a quick Google news archive search before nominating an article.  Others have pointed to reliable sources giving it significant coverage.   D r e a m Focus  15:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.