Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pardot (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Pardot

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. The prior AfD is a sad case of amateur reviewers declaring notability based on not understanding the difference between a reliable source and press releases (which is what one person cited in abundance, impressing the second, while the third deemed the company's existence in Google search sufficient). Sigh. As for me, I don't see anything but press releases, and mentions in passing, primarily in the marketing trade journals walled garden anyway. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 14:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 14:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 14:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to ExactTarget and simply delete this current article as I see no convincingly better improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  07:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom's excellent assessment. Nothing in searches to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.