Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parental abuse by children


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Joyous! Noise! 16:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Parental abuse by children

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article doesn't give off an encyclopedic tone, as it seems like it is trying to convince you parental abuse by children is a major problem instead of just giving the facts. It also contains a lot of original research with no third-party sources added on the introduction. People in the talk page also seem to agree with me on this decision. DJskywrd (talk) 06:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: This seems like a controversial article and I'd like to hear from more editors before closing this discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems like there are sufficient high quality references to show notability. I can see that there are issues requiring clean-up but I'm not seeing sufficient to require WP:TNT. JMWt (talk) 17:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean on it could just use a clean-up, but even if we do this article is always going to seem like an essay report instead of a topic in an encyclopedia. Now I could be wrong and other people might see how this could be a topic, and I would love to see the visions other people have for this article to make it better. But so far I don't know how this could look like an encyclopedia topic. DJskywrd (talk) 00:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately that argument rarely works at AfD. If there are academic papers which directly reference the topic, it is notable. Whilst I understand your frustration, I don't really agree that it is impossible to write a fair article on this topic. JMWt (talk) 08:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep but cull - remove all sections or sentences without citations or substantiating links to articles.Rick Jelliffe (talk)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Definitely has the sources to be notable. Child-to-parent Violence has over 300 scholar hits. A move to Child-to-parent violence should be considered as well as a significant restructure, but AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 16:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.