Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pares Chandra Datta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 01:32, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Pares Chandra Datta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Peson is not notable.Needs additonal citations for verification,poorly referenced. Harishrawat11 (talk) 01:22, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 5.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  03:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. I could not find any independent significant coverage about him, or indeed any coverage at all. It's not even clear what he was supposed to be notable for: he was a physician and civil servant, but nothing that would appear to mark him out for particular fame. --MelanieN (talk) 14:56, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I also could not any coverage at all on this person, nevermind anything resembling substantial coverage in multiple independent sources. Fails all notability guidelines by a wide mile.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 13.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  17:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.