Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pargesa Holding


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Links to the purported "numerous articles" have not been provided.  Sandstein  13:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Pargesa Holding

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sources fail to establish notability, topic fails WP:NCORP requirements  HighKing++ 19:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  HighKing++ 19:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep very notable financial holding company, there have been numerous articles in the FT + WSJ, etc about this company. Devoke  water  20:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Really? Post links to those references please.  HighKing++ 16:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * During the 80’s Pargesa was a very high flying financial conglomerate under the control of two very high profile businessmen Albert Frère + Paul Desmarais, it owned Groupe Bruxelles Lambert + effectively controlled Drexel Burnham Lambert. It had a very high profile, there were numerous articles in the financial press on a daily, weekly, monthly basis. Since these two businessmen have retired the company now has a low profile + is rarely mentioned in the financial press. -- Devoke water  10:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It seems that the company did have a bigger profile in the 1980's, but even if references to this coverage could be found it seems that it would still not pass WP:NCORP, as the reporting of normal business transactions is almost always considered trivial coverage. SailingInABathTub (talk) 14:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, only trivial coverage found, fails WP:NCORP. SailingInABathTub (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NCORP. SK2242 (talk) 14:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.