Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pari Ravan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Pari Ravan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. I cannot find any reliable secondary sources for the article. The creator of the article has only worked on this one article, suggesting CIO WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The main contributor has disclosed a Conflict of Interest in "Abstimmung mit der Künstlerin" means "coordination with the artist". Vexations (talk) 13:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not Who's Who or LinkedIn, we do not let people work to create their own articles here to boost public notice.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources are either self published or not reliable. The list of associations isn't helpful, pay money and pretty much any artist can join. I find nothing online. I looked at the sources in the French article, "newspapers" such as the Nice Matin, link to a site saying the site in question has been deacitvated and redirects to what looks like her own personal site to sell art. Almost looks like a clickbait/fraudulent attempt to give herself traction. Oaktree b (talk) 00:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.