Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paring Bol-anon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Paring Bol-anon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unencyclopedic, a directory of Roman Catholic priests in a particular geographic area. I guess if I had to pick a criteria for deletion, it would be WP:ORG or WP:NOT. (As an aside, I'm probably going to Hell for nominating this article for deletion.) RJASE1 Talk  06:29, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Most of the information on the page is clearly not notable, but I think we need to consider the possibility that the order, as an entity, may be notable. Seeing nothing on the page to establish notability right now, I'm a weak delete, but if somebody who actually knows something about this subject (unlike me) wants to edit the article into something else (a history of the order, any important effects the order has had on Philippine society, and the like) I could certainly be persuaded to change my vote.Sarcasticidealist 22:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment As the article's author, I have no qualms about making the deletion painless by tagging this   . The former redirect, I guess  List of Paring Bol-anon will serve its purpose the best, as a link to the article Diocese of Tagbilaran,  Bohol  and the Immaculate Heart of Mary Seminary.  Furthermore, I am certain that this present article will find its best place in the Cebuano Wikipedia. I will appreciate a message in my talk page giving me the go signal to tag it db-author! Thank you so much for the chance to participate in this democratic process in the English Wikipedia. Ate Pinay  (talk•email) 00:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is basically a list of parish priests in an area, and Wikipedia, in any language, doesn't need that. -- Howard  the   Duck  00:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Unfortunately I could find no independent, non-trivial, reliable sources for the order, so delete.  RJASE, you may just want to add us both to . ;P -- Black Falcon 06:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.