Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris Dahl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:14, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Paris Dahl

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 07:55, 4 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yes, no significant coverage can be seen in the photo (pardon the gag, couldn't resist). None in the media either. Don't delete the photo, please.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 15:54, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment But little innocent kids can wander on Wikipedia and see this picture and cause them to have nightmares...   ;)   Jolenine  ( Talk  -  My Contribs ) 21:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh. Some of the pictures I've seen on Wikipedia are a lot worse than this, really XXX rated. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 21:39, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I do agree that this person has more cloth on than her Riley Evans... Jolenine  ( Talk  -  My Contribs ) 21:42, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge these into one section or article on the year in Penthouse petdom. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:03, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. --CooperDB (talk) 20:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.