Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris Hilton (fragrance)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Paris Hilton. (For those interested, there appear to be a number of fragrance sources in the main article, so Paris Hilton fragrances may be a good idea, though the individual fragrance articles do not have sources to merge.) czar ⨹   16:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Paris Hilton (fragrance)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm nominating these following articles because they read almost like a WP:PROMOTION and there is nothing special about these specific fragrances except the fact that they are released under a famous celebrity.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 17:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Not sure if there is enough written to justify separate articles for each fragrance (currently 17), but her approx. $2 billion (over ten years) branded fragrance business is written about extensively in the fashion industry. See, e.g., Paris Hilton: Building an Empire from Women's Wear Daily, so the general topic satisfies GNG. Perhaps a merge to something like Paris Hilton fragrances might be in order. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 18:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete the lot - I understand we're an encyclopedia & all that but I really see no point in fragrance articles at all.... All that aside I can't find any evidence of notability to warrant articles, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 22:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Fail WP:SPIP; non-notable product endorsements or commissions by a notable celebrity; no reason these can't be a small section in the celebrity article (and debatable whether they merit that).--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 23:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect all to Paris Hilton. Little sourced content, and covered adequately in the article on Hilton. --Michig (talk) 07:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Paris Hilton. Poor references, fail WP:GNG.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  01:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.