Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parisgate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 07:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Parisgate

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article on a new term which is not yet in widespread use. Could find no use of term by reliable published sources (Google News Archive search produces 0 hits, for example), thus the article does not meet the inclusion requirements of Avoid neologisms or Verifiability. Contested PROD, so comes here for deletion. -- Satori Son 15:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Paris Hilton. Little here of substance, nothing here that hasn't already been summarized more cohesively & with better sourcing within the main article. Caknuck 16:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Is there anything of substance relating to Paris Hilton? ~ Infrangible 02:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, don't redirect. Largely unsources neologism. --B. Wolterding 16:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per B. Wolterding. Also superfluous in light of main article about her. Eliz81 17:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. Bearian 12:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect, if the term must be kept. Only the first sentence defines the word Parisgate. The rest of the article goes on to rehash the whole tiresome Paris Hilton business, which is completely covered in the Paris Hilton article. There is nothing in this article that is not covered elsewhere or could not be added to the main article. &#9679;DanMS • Talk 04:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.