Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park Head


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and Redirect to Parkhead (disambiguation)-- JForget  23:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Park Head

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Disambiguation page with 100% red links. Hellno2 (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Parkhead (disambiguation). Similar spelling, no need for two separate dabs, especially if one consists entirely of red links. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Parkhead (disambiguation). No need for two separate disambiguation pages, the two names are similar enough for one page to be sufficient. Names such as this may appear on maps, in documents etc. as either version of the name, and it is easier to find if all are on one page. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 00:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Parkhead (disambiguation) as the two owrded version is the technically correct way for some places. By the way it's not a bad thing to have red links. because.....
 * Red links are an incentive for new users to create their first article.
 * The occurence of the same red link in many articles shows that there is need for a certain article. They then show up in lists such as User:Voorbot/Most_wanted_redlinks
 * When writing a new article, the button "what links here" gives an idea on what information is needed on the subject.
 * When a new article has been created, all red links turn automatically blue! No need to edit all articles containing your subject to create links
 * SunCreator (talk) 04:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to Parkhead (disambiguation), sufficiently similar to share a disambiguation page.-- Beloved Freak  21:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.