Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parked (website)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Parked (website)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:WEB and whole article just feels like a low key advert. Searching for sources didn't turn up much, but with the generic name it's hard to sort through it all. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 * What makes you say that it "feels like a low key advert"? All of its claims are sourced and verifiable, and the website's notability within a marginalized sport is well established. If we want scholarly sources for articles on disc golf, Parked is likely where they will originate from. I'm open to suggestions for improving the article. Iketsi (talk) 15:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Search on parked is unusable; searches on parkeddiscgolf and Parked A Disc Golf don't find any coverage in independent sources, much less significant coverage. The sources in the article are from the site itself and its owner, two brief mentions, and the PDGA Innovation Grant announcement. Doesn't meet WP:WEBCRIT or WP:GNG. Schazjmd   (talk)  15:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.