Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkgate Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Parkgate Press

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication that this publisher meets either the general notability guidelines or the more specific guidelines for companies. Searches for coverage in reliable sources turn up nothing. See also Articles for deletion/The Knight of New Orleans and Articles for deletion/Matt Fullerty. Whpq (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Looks to be of whole cloth with related promotional articles, by same blocked accounts. 99.12.242.170 (talk) 18:54, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:49, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, nn org. --Cameron Scott (talk) 10:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Year-old company. Ghits are primary, social media, a few blogs. Zero Gnews hits (one to an apparently unrelated concern of the same name that appears to have gone bust a decade ago). --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:34, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.