Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parko Paliatso


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn by proposer. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Parko Paliatso

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable amusement park and the article is unsourced. Kpgj hpjm  16:19, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions.  Kpgj  hpjm  16:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

what does 'non-notable' exactly mean? it seems you are a bit triggered by the creation of a simple amusement park page. what's your problem, i still haven't figured. the page is new, sources will be added soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N236ik (talk • contribs) 09:55, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * So, Please add sources now , if you don't add now , then there is every chance that the article may be deleted . Kpgj  hpjm  12:55, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The article must have independent, reliable sources . TripAdvisor is not independent (based on the opinion of people) . So the article effectively has one source . Kpgj  hpjm  13:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Okay @Kpgjhpjm, quite a few more reliable sources were added. And does TripAdvisor, being "not independent", present any misleading information about the park? (e.g. does it do any propaganda against other amusement parks? or does the opinion of people (that have been there!) present a biased view of the complex issues surrounding a simple amusement park? Anyway, I hope you agree with the addition of the new sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N236ik (talk • contribs) 14:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)  N236ik (talk) 14:58, 28 July 2018 (UTC)N236ik

UPDATE: 6 sources added, for a 2-heading long article. If you need more, let me know, so I can cover any other issues somebody may face when reading the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N236ik (talk • contribs) 14:16, 28 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.