Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parks West Mall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Parks West Mall

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think even Eastmain can save this one. I know malls that have entire anchor stores bigger than this whole mall. No sources found, not surprisingly. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions.   --  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete A Walmart and a Safeway. Does that constitute a mall? Ten Pound Hammer is right...but considering this seems to be a local community mall, it is probably more in scale with that demographic. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 01:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, these kind of malls are common in Canada. Discounter at one end, grocery at the other, mostly service oriented tenants in the middle I bet. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Sounds like one of our local shopping centres here in "middle England", except that doesn't even have a Walmart or a Safeway. In fact it doesn't have any supermarket at all.  Delete nonetheless. --  role player 02:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references. -- Eastmain (talk) 04:44, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Might not be a big mall, but it seems to be a pretty integral part of the town it is in. Canuck85 (talk) 09:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Article is now adequately sourced. It's obviously a pretty tiny mall, but why not have an article on it if the sources are there?  Keeping articles like this is in line with WP:NOTPAPER. Amazinglarry (talk) 22:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - references now establish notability the usual way. Wily D 15:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep the reliable sources added establish the claim of notability. This article would benefit greatly from details on history, size, etc. Alansohn (talk) 20:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.