Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkville nature sanctuary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Parkville, Missouri. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Parkville nature sanctuary

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a contested PROD, from an author who has a history of unconstructive edits and has now been permanently blocked. A Google search shows that the place does exist. However, I believe that it is unsafe to rely on anything in this article. Perhaps it is best to delete it entirely, with no prejudice to an article one day being created about this topic by a different author. Richard Cavell (talk) 21:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: no references to show notability or to verify the claims made in the article. Could be notable but as the nominator says, unless we have a user who is willing to take this up immediately, it should be deleted with no prejudice to re-creation.    Dr Strauss   talk   16:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete There is one decent article that documents the park's history here, but there's little coverage about the sanctuary in books (e.g. ) and other online sources . An article could be written, but it would largely be based on a single source. I JethroBT drop me a line 08:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per Nom. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  09:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Parkville, Missouri for now. Maybe notable but certainly a plausible search term. Regards  So Why  16:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Parkville, Missouri. I don't see anything that supports the notability of this topic except for the one source already mentioned. Also, this means that most of the 'titillating' claims in the article are not supported. These claims give the appearance that a WP:Hoax is being foisted on the Wikipedia community. This can affect the reputation of Wikipedia if undetected. If anyone is interested there is List of hoaxes on Wikipedia presented "in order to improve our detection and understanding of them." This article has elements of a hoax. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 18:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Proposal - how about deleting this one and redirecting Parkville Nature Sanctuary? - Richard Cavell (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.