Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parliamentary Business


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Parliamentary Business

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This stub is essentially an 'About Us' page for a publication that no longer exists. It appears as though it was intended to advertise the publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TiredMango (talk • contribs) 05:21, 3 Jul 2024 (UTC)


 * Note., the initial creator of the page, was blocked for blatant advertising. —C.Fred (talk) 05:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Note. This page is only linked to by Brad Trost in a misattributed reference that has since been removed.—TiredMango (talk) 06:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Websites, India,  and Uttar Pradesh. Wikishovel (talk) 09:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: promotional content WP:PROMO. Spworld2 (talk) 10:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.