Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parnia Porsche (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Parnia Porsche
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Db-repost was declined since article was different from previously deleted but the issues discussed in the first AfD have not been resolved. Minor additional fight aside the subject does not come any closer to meeting WP:NBOX. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree that she fails notability as a boxer, but she has notability as model. If the article doesn't give importance to her modelling career, the article should be deleted. Non-notable boxer, notable model. 1, 2, 3, 4. -- Marvellous Spider-Man  13:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Also the previous nomination had votes by sockpuppets and meatpuppets. Marvellous Spider-Man  13:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Three out of four of those sources are related to single incident where she was thrown out of the Candy Shop mansion. It was news because of the mansion, not so much her. Still is an unnotable boxer as well.
 * PS last AFD only had one sockpuppet. Mdtemp was wrongfully blocked and Papaursa has done nothing. Just thought I would add that.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I didn't vote at the previous discussion, but I don't see anything new that increases her notability as a model and no one is arguing she's a notable boxer. Papaursa (talk) 19:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.