Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parodies in Animaniacs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:57, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Parodies in Animaniacs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In-universe fancruft. No secondary sourcing in sight. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Much as I like the Animaniacs, there is a lack of WP:SIGCOV for most of this (Google Scholar had passing mentions as far as I could see). Ansh666 05:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete the very definition of fancruft, sourced only to the show itself (and thus being WP:OR as well). Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:22, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete agree per . JJ98 (Talk) 17:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge to Animaniacs or another topic-related article (if there is one). I'm sure there still could be independent sources out there of this, but as it looks the article not significant enough on it's own. EditorE (talk) 03:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Animaniacs - that IMO is enough. Ansh666 04:19, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.