Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paromita Das


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With the withdrawal of the keep !vote, there is consensus for removal Nosebagbear (talk) 10:23, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Paromita Das

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unable to find sufficient sources to verify notability. NeverTry4Me - TT Page 09:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  NeverTry4Me  - TT Page 09:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indian Author discussions. --  NeverTry4Me  - TT Page 10:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Author-related deletion discussions. --  NeverTry4Me  - TT Page 10:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. No pass of WP:Prof, and the journal that she edits only came into being in 2021. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC).
 * Keep there's enough consensus that Sahitya Akademi winners are notable. Hemantha (talk) 16:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no consensus at all. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC).
 * I see that it's a Golden Jubilee prize, and not the main Sahitya Akademi Award, but with this and this combined with the award, I see enough notability to not change my vote. Hemantha (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , sorry, consensus was perhaps not the appropriate word. Let me reword - a lot of people over the years (1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) have considered Akademi awards significant enough for the articles to be kept. Hemantha (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC) links corrected per Xxanthippe's cmt below Hemantha (talk) 04:23, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * These seem to be dead links and, anyway one prize is not enough. What are needed are multiple in-depth reliable sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC).


 * Comment: It was third prize in the Indian Literature Golden Jubilee Literary Translation that Das won, commendable but the article should probably have previously mislead people thinking it was first. Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh! Because it was also listed at Sahitya Akademi article, I skipped checking the sources. Withdrawing my vote for now. Hemantha (talk) 08:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.