Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parson Consulting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Lack of independent sources is a serious problem. Chick Bowen 03:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Parson Consulting

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No third-party references; no assertion of notability; fails WP:CORP; created by a user whose only other contributions are on another management consulting firm. Biruitorul 01:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Currently reads like it's from a company brochure. Needs secondary references. Renee 02:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Fairly obviously notable, publicly traded company with 500 employees.  If there's a problem with tone or content it can always be pruned - list of alliances, for example, is not appropriate.Wikidemo 14:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's things like unbiased secondary sources, not having 500 pen-pushers, that make a company notable. Biruitorul 03:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Couldn't find non-trivial, independent reliable sources.-Wafulz 23:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.