Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PartStore.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

PartStore.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional sand non notable. "Partstore.com offered expert advice and money saving solutions to prolong the lifespan of electronic gadgets and optimize battery performance" 8 employees!!  DGG ( talk ) 19:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:COMPANY. sovereign°sentinel 04:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I presume a lack of notability for any organization with under 100 employees that is engaging in routine business operations, unless proven otherwise. In this case there is 8 staff, all press release-type sources, and no claim to notability. Pretty easy case. CorporateM (Talk) 07:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately Delete for now (and draft/userfy if wished) as my searches found nothing else to suggest better sourcing and notability here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister   talk  16:11, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't believe the references passes WP:CORPDEPTH. This isn't surprising for a electronic replacement parts company with 8 employees that is #286 on the Internet Retailers Top 500 List. Liz  Read! Talk! 00:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.