Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Participationism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Deville (Talk) 15:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Participationism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no evidence that this is notable. None of the pages linked to by the article mentions "Participationism", and no other citations or references are given. Also searching has failed to produce evidence that there is a notable art movement of this name. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - zero news hits on Google, and few on Google scholar, but I am willing to change my mind. Bearian (talk) 18:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Seems to be a Neologism, all references point to non-independent sources for one particular artist who is claimed to have invented the term/approach: no secondary sources to show notability. TrulyBlue (talk) 21:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, it is as TrulyBlue says. Each of the sites linked is a promotional site for the same artist: in fact it now seems that the article is close to being spam. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NEO, WP:MADEUP. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Absolutely not a term in use for visual arts or graphic design/advertising related history/theory with zero sources found to boot.Deadchildstar (talk) 15:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.