Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partizan Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:10, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Partizan Press

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 02:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe a short article about the parent company Caliver Books is a better idea? - Mgm|(talk) 09:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The company is a specialist publisher of books on military history and associated topics and is at least as notable as many of the publishing houses listed in Category:Book publishing companies of the United Kingdom While there aren't many reviews of the company going around there are numerous reviews of it's books, enough to satisfy WP:COMPANY. NtheP (talk) 10:57, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per a specialist publisher of books on military history and associated topics. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:15, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge. This company seems to be fully part of Caliver Books. Perhaps keep it as a piece of that entry. They don't have their own website - merely that of Caliver Books. Nedenchase (talk) 04:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as there is no evidence of notability in accordance with WP:CORP. The article itself makes no claim to notability, and as such, should have been subject to WP:CSD on account of there being no third party claim of significance or importance. The fact that the company is a specialist publisher holds no weight. Notability to come perhaps. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 15:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge article with Caliver Books, Ikip (talk) 22:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no article for Caliver Books. Is there enough information to create one for them?  Did Caliver Books buy them out, or where they always a part of them?  We can just rename this article Caliver Books, and add to it from there.   D r e a m Focus  01:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree with Dream Foucs. Is Caliver Books a notable company? It seems to me that some editors are treating deletion discussions as a game of Musical chairs. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 08:53, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * My mistake, I was not aware there was no Caliver Books article. I have struck my !vote. I based my comment on Nedenchase comment above. Ikip (talk) 15:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep A notable publisher of historical works. I have created a redirect for Caliver Books.  Colonel Warden (talk) 11:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.