Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partner vetting system


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Partner vetting system

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This article has no references and seems to talk about a particular government policy that hardly seems notable enough to warrant its own article. At best its content should be merged into non-governmental organization (Unless of course someone can show some reliable sources that mention "PVS."

I did some searching, and the only reliable mentions I found of Partner vetting system were brief ones on government websites, but there were no results for the term in mainstream media, and very few in a search of an academic database. — JmaJeremy TALK CONTRIBS   02:54, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 18:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 18:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Without reliable independent citations, it is purely original research.--JayJasper (talk) 18:59, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete With no no WP:RS given, this suggests the article is based on WP:OR unfortunately. --Artene50 (talk) 23:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.