Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Party "Together with the Vytis"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Nomination was a vague wave. The other delete argument stated the used sources did not meet GNG, but notability is based upon available sources. Several of the keep arguments stated that GNG was met, but gave no further evidence, so they are also weak. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Party "Together with the Vytis"

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Minor party, without any real political success or significance Marcelus (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Lithuania. Marcelus (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep the article. There are many Wikipedia articles about minor political parties. This article fufills all (or at least enough) of GNG. Many news articles mention the political party, so there's no need to exclusively resort to original research, which would have invalidated the article. +JMJ+ (talk) 19:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, significant coverage about non-trivial history. Not a WP:MILL party at all. Geschichte (talk) 08:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - took part in several elections - Altenmann >talk 21:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Sourcing used is either primary, or trivial mentions. I don't see much we could use to build an article. Oaktree b (talk) 02:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. If kept should be renamed Together with the Vytis. No need to disambiguate. gidonb (talk) 07:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG. Serious consideration should then be given to gidonb's naming proposal. Jacona (talk) 12:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.