Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Party for Nature, People and Animals (Romania)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  23:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Party for Nature, People and Animals (Romania)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This organization was established just one week ago and has yet to receive substantial coverage from reliable, independent secondary sources.  –MinisterOfReligion  (Talk) 19:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Politics,  and Romania.   –MinisterOfReligion   (Talk) 19:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Even the founder is a no-name. Gikü (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Their interim president is a former county councillor, but their spokesperson, Gabriel Păun, is one of the country's best-known environmental activists and has been listed by Politico as one of the most influential environmental actors. 81.196.240.159 (talk) 14:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Environment.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  23:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting as there is an unbolded Keep here so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 3 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The party, although created a week ago, has appeared in more press articles than other parties that have a Wikipedia page (e.g. NOW Party or Volt Romania). My proposal would be to stop this deletion process. 81.196.240.159 (talk) 14:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete — they should try winning an election first, or at least competing in one. — Biruitorul Talk 23:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.