Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Party of Change in Turkey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mustafa Sarıgül. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Party of Change in Turkey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Short and poorly-sourced stub about a non-notable political party which hasn't won any seats and possibly not even contested any elections; there is nothing in the article stub to suggest other significance either. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. I assume the reason the party hasn't contested any elections is that it was founded less than two months ago. That said, the only source provided is the party's own official website. Independent reliable sources would be needed to establish this party's notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Clearly you're right, about them being a new entrant to Turkish politics. But surely that only further illustrates their non-notability. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mustafa Sarıgül due to a lack of sources and notability. —  csc -1 20:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per csc Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually there are some sources I found:, , , , , . The party is 2 months old but is already involved in some controversies. ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  10:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Changing to Keep per the sources I listed. ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  07:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To evaluate sources provided.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mustafa Sarıgül: Fails GNG and ORGCRIT. The source in the article is not IS RS with SIGCOV, the sources Styyx found are mainly coverage of Mustafa Sarıgül, others wouldn't be SIGCOV about either. Orgs don't inherit notability for individuals they are associated with. This might be TOOSOON, but CRYSTAL. Redirect is a good option.  // Timothy :: talk  03:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mustafa Sarıgül for now. The page can be always expanded in the future once/if the party becomes more prominent. Keivan.f  Talk 20:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect ...  and with that I think we have consensus? - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.